Skip to content

what if the artist has nothing to show yet?

a design concept, not a client property. Naylor Stone is signed to Burn County Music, a Studio Raine client, and the build was made to answer a question that label asked. it is not the artist's live official site.

created by studio raine
open in new tab

one artist, 58 monthly listeners.

this is what a developing artist looks like when the page stops apologising for the numbers. every photograph, every song title, the artwork and the streaming figures are the artist's own, pulled from what you already had. nothing was commissioned and nothing was invented. the site does one job, which is to turn a listener into a name on a list you own.

no chart position, no press, no tour history, and a deal that starts anyway. this is the page about the part of a roster that has to look established before it is. the build below is the whole argument.

plays on the catalog
70,142
monthly listeners now
58
fans you can contact
0
capture on the old page
none

six signs you are about to need this.

  1. you are signing someone who has nothing to show

    the accolades arrive after the deal, not before it. the site is the first thing the artist can point at, and it has to carry the weight the credits will carry later.

  2. the pitch needs a picture

    an artist choosing between labels is choosing between promises. one of those promises can be opened in a browser while you are still in the room.

    vs
  3. the ad spend leaks

    money pointed at a streaming link or a link in bio buys a play and leaves nothing behind. the same money pointed at a page you own leaves a list behind on the way past.

    nothing kept
  4. a roster with no system looks like a roster with no label

    ten artists on ten different site builders is ten different standards, none of them yours, and none of them yours to move when the artist moves.

  5. the artist cannot see the work

    most of what you do is invisible to the person it is being done for. the site is the first place that work becomes something the artist can look at.

  6. the infrastructure outlives the release

    a campaign ends. the list, the store and the catalog do not. what gets built for the first single is still working on the third album.

    ends

what gets built for a roster.

four stages. most labels start with the first and add the rest one release at a time.

sign

win the artist.

everything that happens before there is anything to market.

  • artist.com

    list first. store when there is one

    The artist site

    one page built to look established on day one, carrying whatever the artist actually has. a single song is framed as a release rather than a thin catalog, the story does the work a chart position would do, and your own record is lent to the artist in a credit block.

  • yourlabel.comlabel
    artist-one.comlive
    artist-two.comlive
    artist-three.combuild

    The roster hub

    your own site, with every artist on it. the thing a prospective signing looks at to decide whether you are a real label or one person with a logo.

  • yourlabel.com/d/artistunlisted
    what you build
    what they keep

    a link, not a pdf

    The deal room

    a private, unlisted page per artist you are chasing: what you will build, what the campaign looks like, what they keep. sent as a link instead of a pdf, and it cannot be forwarded into a competitor's inbox by accident.

    built to scope

release

put the record out.

the surfaces every single needs, spun up in a day rather than a fortnight.

  • release day

    preorder
    drop
    day two
    checkout holds at 2am

    Release and pre-save pages

    one per single, live before the song is. the pre-save captures the fan weeks ahead of the date, so release day starts with an audience instead of hunting for one.

  • artist.com

    list first. store when there is one

    Smart links that capture

    the link in bio, rebuilt on the artist's own domain. same job as the free one, except the visitor is counted, tagged and kept instead of handed to whichever platform they clicked.

  • artist.com/epk

    bio
    photography
    credits
    streaming

    The press kit

    a live epk at a url, not a folder in a drive: bio, photography, credits, streaming, contacts. bookers and supervisors open a link. they do not open a zip.

    built to scope

own

keep the audience.

the only part of a campaign that is still an asset the day after it ends.

  • yourlabel.comlabel
    artist-one.comlive
    artist-two.comlive
    artist-three.combuild

    Fan capture into your own crm

    every form on every artist property writing into the system you already run, tagged to that artist, so a release campaign builds one list per artist and one roster-wide list at the same time.

  • free
    member
    vinyl club
    bills monthly, in your account

    Fan clubs and memberships

    the paid tier for the fans who would pay. recurring revenue that belongs to you and the artist rather than to a platform taking a cut of it.

  • yourlabel.comlabel
    artist-one.comlive
    artist-two.comlive
    artist-three.combuild

    The text list

    the same capture, collecting a number as well as an address. an email about a release gets opened by a fraction of a list. a text about it gets read in a minute, which is the difference between a first day and a first week.

earn

make it pay.

the revenue an artist can have before the streaming income arrives.

  • yourlabel.comlabel
    artist-one.comlive
    artist-two.comlive
    artist-three.combuild

    Merch and direct to fan

    a store on the artist's domain with the merchant account in your name. the margin that gets eaten by a marketplace stays in the deal.

  • mp3 lease$29
    trackout$99
    exclusive$1,200

    your tiers. your buyer

    Beat and stem stores

    for the producers on the roster. a catalog, licence tiers, and a contract generated and stamped on every sale, off the marketplace entirely.

  • licence.pdfstamped

    generated per sale, zipped with the files

    Sync and licensing catalogs

    the catalog laid out for the people who license music: searchable, filterable by mood and tempo, cleared and ready to send. sync is the fastest money a developing artist can earn, and it is lost to a badly presented catalog.

signing them is the easy half.

most of what you do after the deal is invisible to the person it is being done for, and an artist who cannot see the work will eventually assume there is none. that is how you lose people who were never actually unhappy with the results. these four are built for the artist to look at, not the public.

preorders every time
vinyl, never merch
bought once at a show
lapsed after the last record

email in this order, not all at once

The artist dashboard

a login of their own showing what the campaign actually did: how the list grew, where the fans came from, what sold, what you spent it on. you stop writing update emails and the artist stops asking for them.

writer a
45%
writer b
30%
label
25%

each side sees only its own row

Royalty and splits in the open

the most common argument between you and an artist is money that only one side can see. a statement the artist can open on their own removes the argument before it starts.

the days you open

3 sessions held

Booking calendars

evaluations, writing sessions, studio days. the artist books time on the days you open instead of chasing a reply, and nothing lands on a day nobody agreed to.

built to scope

sign monday

mon
tue
wed
thu
fri

live by friday

Roster onboarding

sign on monday, live by friday. the gap between the handshake and the first thing the artist can show their friends is exactly where a new signing quietly loses faith.

built to scope

the encyclopedia layer

the one page a label cannot buy for an artist.

a developing artist can be given a site, a store, a release page and a dashboard on the day the deal is signed. the encyclopedia entry is the one asset on the whole platform that has to be earned out of sources, and it is the one search engines and ai assistants read before deciding whether the artist is real. three of them are below, running in full.

draft articles, not published Wikipedia entries. each one is hosted on its own studioraine.art subdomain, hidden from search engines at source, and built so the subject can read and correct it before any submission is made.

Ty Weathers

record producer, songwriter, audio engineer and label founder.

52 references. about 2,450 words of prose

he asked the question that started this service, which was whether we write and publish Wikipedia pages. sixty two files came back in a folder, and they carried the article: a local newspaper piece from June 2001 that no web search will ever surface, and a performing rights catalog that names him as the writer where a certification names only the artist and the label. every online summary gave one of his records a Billboard 200 peak of 161. the printed issue says 158, so the article says 158.

open in new tab

ty weathers. draft article, not publishedtywiki.studioraine.art

Suzi

singer, songwriter, vocal producer and audio engineer.

30 references. about 2,400 words of prose

the exhaustive second pass found a national chart entry that appears in none of her own materials and in none of her press, by reading the raw source of every collaborator and release page instead of the rendered version, then taking the lead to the Official Charts Company and proving the identification. one previously unknown chart entry, thirty references, eighteen of them independent of her. that is a notability case that did not exist the day before.

created by studio raine
open in new tab

suzi. draft article, not publishedsuziwiki.studioraine.art

Knice

recording and mixing engineer, senior engineer at Platinum Sound.

21 references. about 1,900 words of prose

search engines showed one credit. the sweep found 308, of which 96 corroborate on two or more independent platforms, because an engineer's name fragments across every database that carries it and nothing reassembles it for you. his own Instagram held the only statement anywhere of his current job title. the article carries a section on the name fragmentation itself, because any reader who goes to check his credits is about to hit the same wall.

created by studio raine
open in new tab

knice. draft article, not publishedknicewiki.studioraine.art

the roster moves. the infrastructure does not.

whichever of these an engagement covers, the terms hold. the code is assigned to you, the domains and the merchant account are in your name, the fan list is yours, and none of it carries a monthly licence to this studio. an artist leaving takes their masters. they do not take the machine that was built around them.